Video shot by Nick Andrussian | Mizzou Visual Productions Package produced by Evan Johnson | Bond LSC
As Mizzou seniors think about life after graduation, the research lab could serve as a proving ground for future plans.
That was the case for Bennett Flannagan, who graduated from Mizzou in 2024. He spent the last year as a research specialist I in the Paul de Figueiredo lab at Bond LSC, pushing himself and growing his expertise in preparation for graduate school.
His work paid off when he heard he was one of 20 applicants accepted into the Translational Biosciences PhD program at Mizzou’s School of Medicine for fall 2025.
How high-performance computing connects brain differences to apnea
Adobe Stock image
By Sophie Rentschler | Bond LSC
A good night’s rest lays the foundation for your daily performance but when a child’s body hampers airflow, that can lead to cognitive problems in their waking lives.
One recent Mizzou study looks at healthy neurological processes and how this differs for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The study collected a wealth of patient information that can be utilized to help clinicians give a diagnosis quicker in the future.
Yen On Chan, a graduate student in Trupti Joshi’s lab at Bond Life Sciences Center, uses computer models to understand children who have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Chan generates interactive visualizations for the lab with computing techniques thanks to his background in computer engineering. His 3D models illustrate the blood-brain barrier to compare patients without OSA, patients with OSA, and patients with both cognitive problems and OSA.
Yen On Chan, MU graduate student, and faculty lead for translational bioinformatics for NextGen Biomedical Informatics Trupi Joshi review visualizations from their study on April 2, 2025.
The Joshi lab worked alongside researchers from Marshall University, Abdelnaby Khalyfa and David Gozal, who see patients and collect information from them. The study focused on two structural differences induced by exosomes in children — those affecting the neurological components and the blood-brain barrier.
Exosomes are membrane-bound vesicles responsible for intercellular chatter, communicating signals to cells and carrying proteins between them. Exosomes travel through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The BBB is a protective shell for the brain, separating the brain’s blood vessels and its cells. This neurological structure serves as a regulator for what molecules pass from blood to the brain, protecting it from harmful toxins and attacks from bacteria and viruses.
Chan entered the biology field with solely a computer engineering background. He was introduced to plant biology, later leading him to studying bioinformatics.
Yen On Chan, MU graduate student studying bioinformatics, works on his laptop on April 2, 2025.
“I enjoy programming and developing interactive visualizations (of the blood-brain barrier) which can help reveal deeper insights and enhance our understanding of its complex structure and functions,” Chan said.
Patient data from Joshi’s bioinformatics lab is so hefty that it must be run on a supercomputer.
“You’re looking at terabytes of information,” said Joshi, faculty lead for translational bioinformatics for NextGen Biomedical Informatics.
Sleep apnea is a disorder where individuals stop breathing during sleep, which may lead to cognitive problems. It has been linked to anxiety, depression and decreased attention span; however, children more often see poor school performance and behavioral disturbances.
“OSA doesn’t just have an impact on sleep,” Joshi said. “It has an impact on systems beyond that.”
Joshi started her career as a clinician but said she entered the field of bioinformatics around the time the human genome was discovered in the early 2000s, and she has used data to explore a wide array of areas from soybeans to human diseases.
Trupi Joshi, faculty lead for translational bioinformatics for NextGen Biomedical Informatics, poses next to her lab’s visualizations for a childhood sleep apnea study on April 2, 2025.
That data led scientists in this study to conclude that exosomes from patients with OSA — whether it’s those without or with a cognitive deficit — carry out different functions than in those without OSA. Studying exosomes in children with OSA alongside the permeability of the blood-brain barrier can tell researchers how these neurological structures are being disrupted.
Joshi said studying that impact can allow for more personalized therapeutics. She added that because the blood-brain barrier and the neural system is so central to controlling so many activities, it’s integral to understanding this disorder.
“When the permeability (of the BBB) is increased, you have a lot more traffic of molecules going in and out,” Joshi said.
Wealth of data leads to personalized therapeutics
“When you have multiple conditions, you have to be able to overlap it, integrate it and see the differences,” Joshi said.
Chan makes that possible. Joshi said her collaborators are always pleased to find out that Chan is involved since he can write his own code, analyze data, and create his own data visualization tools.
“He can address the entire spectrum,” Joshi said about Chan’s contributions to the bioinformatics lab.
The future of this research lies within the wealth of data available to analyze with computing.
“The beauty of this large amount of data is with computer science and informatics, you can roll it into deep learning (artificial intelligence) models,” Joshi said.
Joshi said this modeling “is going to be helpful for clinicians because now they are better positioned to provide the best therapy that the kid needs, rather than having to wait 10 years later and then finding out.”
This study was published in March 2025 in the journal Experimental Neurology. Read more about it in Mizzou’s School of Medicine release.
This study was supported in part by grants through the Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, and the National Science Foundation.
Mizzou researchers genetically engineer plants to optimize microscopy
By Sophie Rentschler | Bond LSC
Gary Stacey’s lab is a breeding ground for model plants, curated to get the most precise image of the plant leaf tissues.
Those plants help scientists at Mizzou and the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) bridge plant science and microscopy to capture high quality snapshots of a plant’s cellular structure. The collaborators recently co-published their latest contributions to lattice light-sheet microscopy imaging in The Biophysical Journal. It shows a way to better see plant plasma membrane-localized receptors that previously were obscured by the background glow of chlorophyll-like objects.
A plant that’s easier to see (under the microscope)
Mengran Yang’s life’s work is studying cellular proteins in plants, so she plays a big part in this partnership. Since she joined the Stacey lab in Bond Life Sciences at Mizzou as a postdoctoral fellow, Yang has immersed herself in the cellular components of models like Arabidopsis, a small mustard plant used ubiquitously in plant research. Whenever people know about Arabidopsis, Yang gleams with excitement.
“We want to use microscopic technologies to solve biology questions,” Yang said about the reason the collaboration came to be.
This collaboration with EMSL– a DOE Scientific User Facility located at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory – will create precision imaging that can help future researchers understand subcellular location of proteins that contribute to a crop’s disease resistance or optimize farming to yield the best harvest, among other applications.
Yang has never visited Washington nor met the researchers from EMSL in person, but despite the distance she said she has vested trust in the team to share high resolution results.
Yang curates a handful of genetically modified or transgenic plants which produce thousands of seeds. She then sends the seeds off to a laboratory in Washington, where her collaborators grow their own plants optimized for light-sheet microscopy. Without this genetic modification, EMSL wouldn’t be able to analyze cellular components of plants with great detail let alone fulfill their quest to filter out chlorophyll.
Yang stashes the seeds of the genetically manufactured plants in Petri dishes where they emerge in their green leafy glory roughly 10 days later. She plants the newly sprouted seedlings that grow tall, decorated with white flowers. Afterwards, she tests the phenotype of the plants to ensure they are truly genetically modified. This process could take months.
She leaves the plants to shrivel, making it prime time to gather seeds. Yang is there for every stage of the plant’s life cycle, and she even sees them off as they are shipped across the country.
“Conducting this process with transgenic plants is very time consuming from phenotyping to harvesting,” Yang said. After seeing the images from EMSLs microscope, Yang added it makes her feel like her work is worth it.
One of the beauties of studying plants is because they “have more receptors localized on the plasma membrane compared to animals,” Yang said. This very factor lured her into studying Arabidopsis.
From modified plant to a clearer picture
The Stacey lab has spent more than a decade working with EMSL, because they need each other. This work wouldn’t be possible without the Stacey lab’s sharing its plant engineering know-how and EMSL contributing its national laboratory imaging prowess.
“Humans are social animals,” Stacey said about the natural urge to collaborate in the scientific research realm.
The researchers enhanced clarity in their pictures by getting around natural plant pigments that cloud their results. Chlorophyll — the compound that both gives the plant its color and is responsible for absorbing energy from the sun — is a nuisance for florescence microscopy imaging. It pollutes an image with background light and compounds the challenge the plant cell wall presents, which makes it difficult to tag internal cell parts with fluorescent markers needed to see plant receptors and other cell parts under a microscope.
Yang genetically engineers DNA that is inserted into the plant cell, making the receptors of the plant have the ideal functions for fluorescent viewing. The receptors are fused to a tag, thanks to this genetic process, which faces the outside of the cell making it easier for antibodies to bind to them. These antibodies are ready for fluorescent viewing. These tags glow when excited with a certain wavelength of light, making them stand out from other cell structures.
This method is the first of its kind, letting scientists see the location of a protein at a molecular resolution.
Because Yang’s research addresses fundamental questions in plant biology, she said it may appear “useless” to those not immersed in the field. But, seeing cell parts is a vital step to understanding how they contribute to things like plant defense. She joked that when she explains her research to her parents, she is met with looks of confusion.
“Progress (that impact humankind) is based on thousands or millions of basic research findings,” she said.
The study “Lattice light-sheet microscopy allows for super-resolution imaging of receptors in leaf tissue” published in the Biophysical Journal in February 2025. This research is funded by grants from the U.S. Department of Energy Biological and Environmental Research (DOE-BER), the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health.
Susie Dai doesn’t like to waste time, something obvious as she translates Emily Dickinson poems from English to her native Chinese while waiting for an oil change. She would much rather prefer to be doing research.
“You cannot write a paper or a grant [in a waiting room lobby],” she explains about why she resorts to her hobbies.
Dai gets bored easily, so she keeps busy in any way she can, a trait that attracted her into research. It’s about the art of asking new questions, something that will serve her well as one of the newest principal investigators at Bond Life Science Center at Mizzou.
When asked about how she spends her free time, she replied “I think about the projects.”
Dai’s main focus is converting wasted carbon materials — like agricultural residues and greenhouse gas carbon dioxide — into a useful product. She said the goal is to get high-value products out of carbon waste with microbiological tactics, hopefully contributing to society as a result.
By making old and wasteful carbon materials anew, “you can be rich,” Dai joked, especially due to the carbon cycle on earth, and its multitude of uses across organisms. “Carbon is the vein of the economy.”
Dai has also spent her career studying the health risks of chemical exposure and working with government agency regulation compliance programs. With experience working across state and government entities, she melds fundamental chemistry and biology with applications in the engineering realm. Being a chemist by training but an engineer by craft has its advantages.
“Not only do you ask new questions, but you can find new applications of your technology,” she said. “You use traditional scientific logic to answer the question for new phenomena.”
Prior to touching down at Mizzou, Dai spent three years at the University of Iowa’s State Hygienic Laboratory — the state’s environmental and public health laboratory — and worked for 16 years across various professorships at Texas A&M University.
Dai moved from Texas to Iowa, then from Iowa to Texas again. Finally, she migrated from Iowa to Missouri. She is interested in applying her science to new populations and problems in every new place she lands.
She focuses on three areas in her research: discovering how to turn a product’s waste into valuable material, assessing manufactured products and how to implement the sustainable research across communities and finally applying her study findings to outreach.
Dai’s research also lasers in on agricultural waste like the stalks left after fall harvest.
If one wandered in a cornfield they would be surrounded by lignin, an organic biopolymer that supports plants in their cell walls. contained in the very residues of the crops. Dai’s research mission is to find a new purpose for this underutilized material.
Dai uses electrocatalysis in her lab, a process that utilizes electric current to expedite chemical reactions, to shape-shift a simple carbon into a more complex molecule like a substrate, like acetate or ethanol, for an organism’s food. The substrate is used for fermentation.
She said that using the wasted carbon dioxide as a fuel for microorganisms makes her research novel.
“You would combine science and engineering together,” she said, “so, you can do the best applied research.”
Come meet Susie at 10 a.m., April 5, 2025, in Bond LSC’s Room 171. She will speak at Saturday Morning Science, discussing mushrooms and fungi and their sustainable potential.
ST. LOUIS, MO – The Academy of Science – St. Louis is proud to announce the recipients of the 27th Annual Outstanding St. Louis Scientists Awards, recognizing individuals and organizations that have made significant contributions to the advancement of science, engineering, and technology. The awards ceremony will be held on April 3, 2025, at the Missouri Botanical Garden.
Since its inception, the Outstanding St. Louis Scientists Awards has honored some of the brightest minds in the region, celebrating their exceptional achievements, groundbreaking discoveries, and lasting impact on science and society. This year’s honorees represent a diverse array of disciplines, from plant science and medicine to artificial intelligence and STEM education.
2025 Award Recipients
Fellows Award (Outstanding Achievement in Science)
● Dr. Steven Levine, Bayer – A global leader in ecotoxicology, Dr. Levine has made pioneering contributions to environmental safety assessments for crop protection.
● Dr. Ram Dixit, Washington University – A distinguished biologist whose research on the cytoskeleton is enhancing our understanding of cell shape and plant morphogenesis.
George Engelmann Interdisciplinary Award (Collaborative Science Achievement)
● Dr. Allison Miller, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center & St. Louis University – An innovative leader in plant science, engaged in interdisciplinary approaches to explore biology, evolution and root-shoot interactions to support sustainable agriculture systems.
Innovation Award (Exceptional Potential in Science, Engineering, or Technology)
● Dr. Peng Bai, Washington University in St. Louis – A trailblazer in battery research, developing new methods to improve energy storage and efficiency.
● Dr. Phani Chavali, Bayer – A machine learning and AI expert revolutionizing plant breeding to accelerate crop development and genetic gain.James B. Eads Award (Excellence in Engineering or Technology)
● Dr. Bing Yang, University of Missouri & Donald Danforth Plant Science Center – A world-renowned researcher in plant genome engineering, advancing CRISPR/Cas technology for disease-resistant crops.
Peter H. Raven Lifetime Achievement Award (Career of Service in Science, Engineering, or Technology)
● Mary E. Burke, MA, AAAS Fellow, Retired CEO, The Academy of Science – St. Louis – A transformative leader in STEM education and outreach, expanding science accessibility across the region.
Science Educator Award (Excellence in Science Education)
● Dr. Farzana Hoque, St. Louis University – A dedicated medical educator and mentor, advancing diversity, equity, and health awareness in the medical sciences.
● Peggy James Nacke, Retired Director of Special Projects and Events, The Academy of Science – St. Louis
– A champion of citizen science, spearheading groundbreaking STEM initiatives like the region’s first e-Science Fair and BioBlitz programs.
Science Leadership Award (Leadership in Advancing Science and Scientists)
● Dr. Thomas Eickhoff, Bayer – A mentor and industry leader driving innovation in agriculture and digital farming.
● MilliporeSigma, the Life Science business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany – A St. Louis-based global leader in life sciences and pharmaceutical development, committed to STEM education and workforce development.
Deborah Patterson Award (Broadening Participation in STEM – Inaugural Award)
● Deborah Patterson, Former President of the Monsanto Fund – A tireless advocate for inclusive STEM education, instrumental in establishing STEMpact and STEMSTL.
A Celebration of Science and Innovation
The Outstanding St. Louis Scientists Awards Ceremony will bring together the region’s scientific, academic, and business communities to celebrate the honorees’ remarkable achievements. The event will also highlight the Academy’s ongoing commitment to fostering science literacy and inspiring the next generation of innovators.
For more information about the event, sponsorship opportunities, or to purchase tickets, please visit
www.academyofsciencestl.org or contact Executive Director Kate Polokonis (kpolokonis@academyofsciencestl.org).
About The Academy of Science – St. Louis Founded in 1856, The Academy of Science – St. Louis is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting science literacy, education, and collaboration throughout the region. Through public seminars, student programs, and community engagement, the Academy continues to inspire scientific curiosity and discovery.
Non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma occurs in the glandular tissue of the lung and is illustrated here with a histopathology light micrograph. | Adobe Stock
By Roger Meissen | Bond LSC
Treating lung cancer is tricky business.
Not only is it more deadly than other cancers due to late diagnosis, but resistance also grows quickly against its few existing treatments and therapeutics, so new approaches are vital to higher survival.
That’s especially true for one subset of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and University of Missouri scientists have shown promising progress toward understanding what drives this cancer growth and developing a way to treat it.
Using aptamers — short strands of DNA or RNA — a team from the Donald Burke lab at MU’s Bond Life Sciences Center decreased tumor growth and viability in mice by binding it with mutated receptors on the surface of cancer cells in this oncogene positive of non-small cell lung cancer. Their work published in Nature’s Precision Oncology.
“The aptamer folds up into a 3D structure that actually targets these mutated surface receptors that are always on, always signaling, in these cancer cells,” said Brian Thomas, lead author and Mizzou MD-PhD candidate in the Burke lab. “That binding event prevents growth and slashes proliferation to prevent the survival of these cancer cell lines.”
Intended to contribute to the federal Cancer Moonshot that aims to reduce cancer mortality 50 percent or more by 2050, the lab’s developments show promise for a novel therapeutic for a difficult to treat type of cancer. Current first line treatments involve tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that prevent mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in LUAD from causing uncontrolled cell growth. However, resistance to these drugs typically grows in 12-18 months, and second- and third-line treatments frequently don’t work.
“EGFR is present on cell surfaces, but mutant EGFR is only present on cancer. This receptor is always on because of these mutations, and they cause uncontrolled growth, progression and cancer survival,” Thomas said. “Essentially, we show that when our anti-EGFR reagent, our aptamer, binds with this receptor, EGFR, it competed with FDA-approved antibodies — specifically cetuximab —commonly used to treat types of cancer including colorectal cancer.”
Because this aptamer competed with a clinically relevant antibody, Thomas and colleagues thought that it might have anti-cancer properties in certain cancers.
Aptamers aren’t a new technology. The small molecules of DNA or RNA were first considered by scientists in 1990 due to their potential to selectively bind to very targeted areas on a cell, and they show promise as therapeutics or as vehicles to deliver cancer drugs and treatments for other diseases. Their promise lies in being relatively inexpensive, readily scalable and their relatively low level of toxicity since the body’s adaptive immune system doesn’t recognize them.
Only two aptamers have been approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the past 35 years — one in 2004 and one in 2023— but both provide treatment for an eye condition called macular degeneration. This low number of FDA-approved treatments from aptamers boils down to a few challenging shortcomings to the molecules.
“Their two primary limitations are that since aptamers are DNA or RNA, they can get chopped up and disposed of by things in the body called nucleases, and that they are very small,” Thomas said. “So, instead of staying in the body, they will be filtered out by the kidneys and essentially peed right out, which is why we injected our (aptamer) reagent directly into subcutaneous mouse tumors.”
Future research can be targeted at overcoming these obstacles. Thomas said coupling the aptamer to make it larger and exploring different delivery methods could make a treatment like this viable. “We can potentially make the aptamer bigger by appending it to some larger molecule that that can keep it in the body and keep it from getting filtrated, he said. “For lung cancer, researchers could also explore how to aerosolize it. Getting a patient to inhale it through an intranasal drip or nebulizer treatment, we can get high doses of oligonucleotides into the lung that way.”
Read more about this work in Thomas’ Behind the Paper article on Nature’s website.
Collaborators on this study include Bond LSC principal investigator Donald Burke and former Burke lab member David Porciani as well as Bond LSC principal investigator Trupti Joshi, graduate student Sania Awan of Mizzou’s Institute for Data Science and Informatics and Mizzou NextGen Precision Health researcher Mark Daniels.
Plant scientists recommend concerted approach to global food security
Adobe Stock image
By Roger Meissen | Bond Life Sciences Center
Climate change presents increasing dangers to crops, and plant scientists across the world recognize rapid changes are needed to prepare for its threats.
That’s the message a coalition of plant and agriculture researchers detailed recently in Trends in Plant Science. Organized by Michigan State University’s Plant Resilience Institute (PRI), their paper spelled out how farmers, scientists and policymakers must work closely together to develop crops that can withstand increasingly harsh environmental conditions.
“As rising temperatures and extreme weather events threaten crop yields and nutritional quality, our ability to feed a growing population becomes more and more uncertain,” said Seung Y. “Sue” Rhee, MSU Research Foundation Professor and PRI Director. “The urgency is clear: without climate-adapted crops, we face risks of famine, mass migration and global conflict.”
Ron Mittler, a Bond Life Sciences Center researcher and plant biologist at the University of Missouri, joined 20 experts to make recommendations on how to best address these dangers. Mittler’s science brings together the effects of many types of environmental stresses — from salinity and flooding to heat and drought — on the overall health of plants.
Ron Mittler, Bond LSC principal investigator and Curators’ Distinguished Professor of Plant Science and Technology | photo by Roger Meissen, Bond LSC
“We’re running experiments subjecting plants to 5-6 different stresses in all possible combinations, and what we’re finding is you don’t really have to have a strong stress, but rather a combination of different low-level stresses to actually topple a plant,” Mittler said. “We call it the multifactorial stress principle where we see — even with low levels of stressors — the more complex the environmental stress combinations become, the more rapid the plant deterioration.”
While scientists have advanced understanding of how plants handle environmental stresses, turning that knowledge into solutions for farmers is difficult due to financial, logistical and technical hurdles, according to the authors. These challenges are even greater in developing countries, where limited resources hinder solutions tailored to local needs. Improving plant resilience isn’t just a scientific issue, the authors said — it’s also a societal one that requires public support, clear communication and favorable policies.
The researchers propose several practical recommendations to leverage plant resilience to fight climate change and secure food supplies globally. They call for closer collaboration between scientists and policymakers and to establish research partnerships between the U.S., Europe and developing countries. The group recommends adopting a “farm to lab to farm” approach, where real farming challenges inform research, and discoveries are quickly applied back in the field. They also stress the importance of engaging the public about new technologies and being open about their benefits and risks to build trust. Finally, they advocate for science-based, efficient regulations to expedite the adoption of innovations.
“It can take a long, long time — often more than 10 years — to get a plant that shows more resistance to climate change to market, and within those 10 years things could change so that this newly developed transgenic plant may not be good enough anymore,” Mittler said. “Climate change doesn’t care about rules, and things will deteriorate faster than we can respond to under the regulations that we have now, so we think things need to be rethought to make them much friendlier to development and distribution of solutions.”
The group of 21 co-authors from nine countries formed as an outcome of the First International Summit on Plant Resilience, spearheaded by the PRI earlier this year. The summit promoted global cooperation in plant resilience research efforts, bringing together preeminent plant scientists from diverse disciplines. Together, they created a roadmap to position plant resilience research as a cornerstone of global climate change solutions.
Rhee remains optimistic about the future of plant resilience.
“By prioritizing innovation and working as a global community, we can create agricultural systems that not only withstand climate change but also ensure a sustainable, healthy future for generations to come,” she said.
William Picking standing next to a poster from his work in the Journal of Molecular Biology. This diagram depicts the structure of protein PscK from the pathogen Pseudomonas Lanuginose, which is used in a system to inject toxins into immune cells. Images A and C depict the protein’s structure and image B shows how the protein is used with a secretion apparatus.
Salmonella is one bacterium everyone’s heard of. It’s the scourge of meatpacking plants and involved in spinach recalls every year, causing unwelcome intestinal unrest and dangerous disease when encountered in high enough numbers.
William Picking wants to better understand how to combat this and other food and water system hazards. The Bond Life Sciences Center scientist reached down to take a piece of paper to quickly jot down a drawing of a nifty way some bacteria have evolved to avoid the defenses of the animal cells it infects. One of the focuses of his research is to determine how the bacterial type 3 secretion works. Understanding this secretion apparatus may help scientists create better, more targeted drugs to fight pesky bacterial infections and outbreaks.
His drawing showed the type 3 secretion apparatus (T3SS), the bacterial structure that injects specialized proteins into cells to avoid being detected and attacked by those cells. In some cases, the apparatus actually invades those cells so the bacteria can grow inside them. Scientists like Picking aim to use proteins from this needle-like structure to develop new strategies to prevent disease
This “injectosome” is basically a syringe. Composed of a base with a channel through it connected to a needle, this apparatus injects into and through the membrane of its host cell to get its proteins inside.
Scientists have a general idea of what the T3SS secretion apparatus looks like, but Picking’s current research focuses on understanding exactly how the injectosome works as a microscopic machine at a deeper level.
Picking and his team zoom in on the specific way that it selects the proteins to be secreted and energizes that process so they can deliver their specialized proteins.
This process must be coordinated so that the proteins are properly injected into the cell, so they invade those cells or, in some cases, kill the host cells trying to harm the bacteria.
The power behind this process comes from the ability of bacteria to recognize the surface of the organism to form a hole in the host cell membrane. The needle then passes those proteins through the hole.
The parts of the injectosome that are inside the bacteria are involved in determining what proteins are secreted and in what order. This overall internal segment is called the sorting platform and it also provides the actual power that drives the secretion process, causing the secreted protein to be unfolded and then forcing it through the needle and ultimately into the host cell. It makes the injection of this process easier and speeds it up.
“We have a general idea of what the sorting platform looks like but our research focuses on improving our understanding of this structure to get at the mechanisms guiding secretion,” Picking said. “We even want to understand the movements within this structure that are part of the secretion process. “
Picking’s main focuses are bacteria like Salmonella and Shigella, but other bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa can shut down the communication some immune system cells use to combat an attacking microbe.
“By understanding this apparatus at a high resolution, at a detailed structural level, we can potentially design drugs to inhibit the process of infection.” Picking said.
The trick is to reverse engineer a drug that operates like an antibiotic from the knowledge of T33s. That small drug could block the process of infection, and the body’s immune system can kill off the invader.
The problem that arises for scientists is the antibiotic often kills the bacteria. This leads to antibiotic resistance, a process called selective pressure. That’s not good news. The drug engineered from reverse T33s shuts off the bacteria instead of killing it. But, by shutting off the bacteria, your immune system will naturally recognize the pathogen or foreign invader and then destroy it itself. This is an ingenious idea, gaining popularity with bacterial scientists meant to avoid the often-inevitable bacterial resistance.
Bacterial resistance is a chronic problem in our world where antibiotics become less effective as the bacteria evolve around its protection. This causes problems the problems you hear in hospital systems where MRSA bacteria threaten life after antibiotics fail to fight them off or even how low levels of antibacterial agents in hand soap create more persistent colonies on surfaces.
Zooming in on the T3SS injectosome may give clues to better fight infection and reduce the number of people affected by dysentery and other common bacterial infections.
“It’s a great goal, not a goal our laboratory will accomplish in the immediate future, but we hope to provide the information for someone else to create these drugs to get around the problems of antibiotic resistance.” Picking said.
Cynthia Tang is pursuing an MD/Ph.D. and has researched in the labs of Donald Burke and Henry Wan.
By Beni Adelstein | Bond LSC
Research skills aren’t built in a day, but Cynthia Tang’s diligence brought those skills to bear as she recently received a National Institutes of Health fellowship to further her budding career in science.
“Receiving the F30 fellowship means that the NIH sees value in my research proposal, in my training environment at the University of Missouri, and in my potential to become an independent physician-scientist,” said Tang, who works in Henry Wan’s lab at Bond Life Sciences Center.
This F30 predoctoral fellowship supports the research of students pursuing M.D.-Ph.D.’s. These awards help lighten the financial burden of a degree path that takes the better part of a decade for Tang and others pursuing their passions in research.
Tang came to the University of Missouri in 2018, started her journey as an M.D. student, then took a break to pursue her Ph.D. In the dual M.D.-Ph.D., the first two years are spent in pre-clinical studies followed by a full-time Ph.D. for three to five years and then students finish up with clinical training.
So, what project captured NIH’s attention?
Tang focused on how Covid-19 spreads and who gets it in rural areas. The aim is to identify people who have a higher chance of getting sick or being hospitalized so preventive measures can be offered earlier.
Lots of data must be gathered to accomplish this. Scientists sequence the genome of coronavirus variants to get a detailed profile and compare how that genetic makeup evolves over time. They do this by testing nasopharyngeal swabs—the Q-tips that are commonly used for covid tests—of people suspected of coronavirus infection. They use electronic health records to see who is getting sick, and add demographic information on age and location to the clues researchers analyze.
Tang focuses on rural populations in the U.S., especially in Missouri, because there is a gap in data from those communities. Once those at highest risk are identified, scientists can prioritize early prevention of COVID-19.
“Our biggest motivation for studying rural populations is so that we can better understand the way the virus changes and how to better serve those communities,” she said.
The process of planning for the grant itself enabled Tang to finetune the quality of her work.
“I feel like it helped speed up my Ph.D.,” she said. “We had to break down the research study into all the little pieces of what needs to be done and what to do when things go wrong. Everything must be so well thought out to put the grant together.”
After Tang’s initial fellowship application was rejected, she challenged herself to put together a completely new study design in under two months for her second proposal.
“It was the best thing that ever happened” said Tang, smiling. “I am extremely grateful to Dr. Wan and my thesis committee.”
This fellowship has provided many opportunities to Tang. She traveled overseas to present her findings at international conferences, which connected Bond LSC research with an international science community. Last year she was in Belfast, Ireland, and this month she will be in Valencia, Spain.
Where is Tang now?
She’s working remotely as she wraps up her Ph.D. and will graduate from Mizzou this upcoming December. Once she secures that Ph.D., she will head out to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in January 2023 to finish her clinical training. Then she will enter the homestretch of her dual degree journey, finishing her M.D. in May of 2026.
Cynthia Tang currently serves as president-elect of the American Physician Scientists Association and will continue in this role next spring.
Kamal Singh (right), a principal investigator at Bond Life Sciences Center, assistant professor in the MU College of Veterinary Medicine, and the director of the Molecular Interactions Core stands next to Saathvik Kannan (left), a senior at Hickman High School and a computer programmer and researcher for the Singh lab. | Photo by Roger Meissen, Bond LSC
By Sarah Kiefer
The spikes that protrude from SARS-CoV-2 present a topography of peaks that drive one MU researcher to ask more questions.
To Kamal Singh, a principal investigator at Bond Life Sciences Center, assistant professor in the MU College of Veterinary Medicine, and the director of the Molecular Interactions Core those spikes are a changing map with every new variant of coronavirus, and they lead his lab to study its constant evolution of mutations and proteins.
The Singh lab recently found an unexpectedly high number of APOBEC-mediated mutations among a patient cohort from South India, who were vaccinated and have taken remdesivir to treat COVID-19. Using data from patients from South India, Saathvik Kannan, a senior at Hickman High School and a computer programmer and researcher for the Singh lab, tracked changes to the virus’ proteins.
“Viruses are known to evolve under pressure, so what’s happening in this case is that antibodies recognize the virus in a cell, and the virus sees that, ‘okay, there is someone to stop me,’ so it makes mutations,” Sing said.
The virus’ genome often alters, by mutating, inserting, or deleting the building blocks within RNA and DNA known as nucleotides, depending upon the pressure that viruses experience. Only some of these sugar-containing nucleotides are mutated, but these small changes can form a new virus variant.
“A few months ago, we didn’t know the reason behind all of these different mutations in patients because we did not look for APOBEC-mediated changes in viral genome,” Singh said.
Kannan found that between October 2022 to January 2023, the mutations among the patient cohort varied between 114 to 83. With that information, he identified 50% of patients who have diabetes and that when they take insulin the APOBEC protein is also induced. This new discovery leads to more questions about those with underlying conditions like diabetes or hypertension, and how they are affected differently by the drug.
“Ideally if a virus were to evolve you would see a linear progression, but you don’t see that here,” Kannan said. “This shows us that APOBEC proteins are likely one of the causes of this evolution in the virus and the makers of these variants.”
When the number of mutations vary significantly, like in the cohort, it re-affirms that the COVID-19 variants evolve independently.
Viruses don’t stop to wait for researchers to find the root of the problem. They constantly change, and in cases where the patients are vaccinated and take remdesivir, the virus evolves by taking advantage of the APOBEC protein.
Singh started down this path of research early on in the pandemic. Through PCR tests — which converts tiny amounts of RNA into DNA then copies it to a measurable level — he learned more about each mutation by comparing new samples to the original viral strain. Until this point, there had only been around 40 identified mutations in the spike protein in the different XBB sub-variant, but Singh’s lab has identified two more. The details have been recently published in The Lancet Journal. The two mutations found in this process, A27S and T747I, were unique to this cohort.
“For the first time we’re able to get more clues on what is actually happening because we were able to compare it to patient samples in the XBB subvariant and we had a wealth of data to work with,” Kannan said.
The Omicron variant yields new mutations constantly — currently at 43 and counting — and presents plenty of opportunity to look for differences. Singh directs his team to comb through variant sequences to identify differences in their genetic code. Soon they begin to identify trends from one month to another.
“The main difference here was that we have high quality patient data this time, from a patient cohort in Southern India, as opposed to getting it from a database,” Singh said. “The patient cohort tells us that the mutations are more than what was reported before.”
From January to June of 2020, Kannan found mutations that were present in one hundred percent of the sequences. When the Alpha Beta variant arrived in November 2020, they immediately knew what the mutated changes were. Their findings were published in the paper, ‘Clinical characteristics and novel mutations of omicron subvariant XBB in Tamil Nadu, India – a cohort study,’ in April 2023 in the Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia Journal.
After new variants — such as the XBB sub-variant of Omicron — materialized, Singh’s lab identified existing drugs and new drug compounds that match structural weaknesses presented by mutations.
One way Singh’s lab keeps abreast of new variants is by utilizing the tools they have available to their advantage with in-house programs either in Python or in R programming languages. Their lab can construct non-infectious, virus-like particles that contain all the same characteristics as the virus minus its genome, or its genetic material makeup.
A collaboration between University of Missouri and University of Nebraska Medical Center helped identify the new drug compound, MU-UNMC-2 in addition to the MU-UNMC-1, previously found in late 2021, as potential coronavirus treatments.
Singh and his lab use 3D visualization and computational tools to show the relationship between the mutations and their effect. They combine this knowledge with the 100% vaccinated and remdesivir patient cohort. | Photo by Sarah Kiefer, Bond LSC
Remdesivir, ribavirin, favipiravir, and molnupiravir were among existing drugs that can be used to treat COVID-19 under certain conditions. Remdesivir — previously ineffective as an Ebola virus treatment — initially proved somewhat useful for COVID-19. Molnupavir only showed moderate promise, and the two drugs were approved for emergency use by the FDA for the treatment of COVID-19. Remdesivir now has full FDA approval.
“To address the problem, you have to find the problem. Where is the virus? What can we address? And then we go after it,” Singh said. “My lab was the first one in the world who suggested when the pandemic came that these are a few drugs that can be used and remdesivir was one of them. I’m very proud that I could contribute to human health in that way.”
Singh views two drugs found in 2021 with a collaboration between the University of Missouri and the University of Nebraska Medical Center. The figure shows the two structures of the drugs and how they bind in between the virus and its entry point into the cell. | Photo by Sarah Kiefer, Bond LSC
With knowledge of this new protein in hand, Singh’s lab now is moving forward to focus most of their attention on the APOBEC protein mediated mutations and how underlying health conditions can affect an individual’s reaction to certain drug compounds.
“The virus has been outsmarting us, outfoxing us, until now. As soon as we get something, it changes itself,” Singh said. “That keeps us motivated as we chase it.”
The Singh lab’s research on the XBB sub-variant mutations was published in the paper ‘Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: Unique features and their impact on pre-existing anitbodies’ in the “Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal” in June 2021 and their updated findings can be found in the paper ‘Clinical characteristics and novel mutations of omicron subvariant XBB in Tamil Nadu, India – a cohort study,’ published in “The Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia Journal” in April 2023.
Funding provided by: Bond LSC, Swedish research Council, American Lung Association, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research in collaboration with Prof. Gary Weisman of the Bond Life Sciences center.